<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jason Van Dyk &#187; online communities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jason-v.com/tag/online-communities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jason-v.com</link>
	<description>My space on the web!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:36:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.jason-v.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>What is Guvera like since it first started?</title>
		<link>http://www.jason-v.com/2011/03/08/what-is-guvera-like-since-it-first-started/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jason-v.com/2011/03/08/what-is-guvera-like-since-it-first-started/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guvera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web presence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jason-v.com/?p=621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is Guvera like since it first started? Well to be honest I don&#8217;t know as there wasn&#8217;t enough to keep me interested through the BETA period. The obvious bugs, and what seemed like an impossible way to increase your points (basically how much you could download) once you had used them all up! The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Guvera like since it first started? Well to be honest I don&#8217;t know as there wasn&#8217;t enough to keep me interested through the BETA period. The obvious bugs, and what seemed like an impossible way to increase your points (basically how much you could download) once you had used them all up!</p>
<h3>The Login Screen</h3>
<p>I really don&#8217;t like how the text is aligned to the right, however the input is aligned to the left. So when you click on the box your focus is in the wrong spot (text should disappear when you click the box)</p>
<h3>Home Page</h3>
<p>There is a lot more going on, social network links, images of bands and groups, etc. This isn&#8217;t to be loved or hated but I see this as an improvement from what I remember.</p>
<h3>Artist</h3>
<p>This artist page has some cool idea&#8217;s going on. It is no Ping and it isn&#8217;t trying to be. Technically Guvera existed way before Apple announced their Ping service. It has 4 main sections which I&#8217;ll talk about quickly.</p>
<p>Overall though it is a decent idea for a page, and has many decent ideas within the page. This seems to be the biggest problem for me. There isn&#8217;t a way I can click on the subheading/section to see specific information or expanded information for that section. Pretty much all of the sections need to be removed from this page. Instead I would have the &#8216;Artist&#8217; section down the bottom take up the whole page, removing the scrolling within the section and that way I get what I expect.</p>
<h4>Touring</h4>
<p>This lists the artists which I can only but assume are touring at the moment. Of course I&#8217;m not sure where this information is gathered from and there is no information on the site regarding dates, locations, info, etc. I did a few random checks on artists who have been listed as touring or having gigs this year and all cases they actually were (3 tests). Basically great idea, but provide information about the tour! There is also only space for 7 artists to be on tour, which is displayed in total random fashion. ie: If there are more than 7 artist on tour, it will only show 7 and there isn&#8217;t a way to list anymore</p>
<h4>Greatest Hits</h4>
<p>Well similar to above, artist who pretty much have &#8216;greatest hits&#8217;. Not much to go on here, it does what it says. Also in the similar 7 artist order, at least when you click on the link it takes you to their album/songs as that is the expected behaviour.</p>
<h4>New Releases and Charting</h4>
<p>Same thing, I guess this is an area to list new songs and if nothing new is happening, songs that are charting. Not much to say here really. Good concept.</p>
<h4>Artists</h4>
<p>Well this is stupid, it lists artist starting with A, however it can&#8217;t lis them all see it goes over pages. Fair enough. But then why do I have to scroll horizontally in this small window? I&#8217;m not a fan at all. Besides there seems to be a lot of artist with duplicates in the list. This needs a major revamp, great idea just not done well at all.</p>
<h3>Albums</h3>
<p>The Albums page follows the same formula of Artist. However I can&#8217;t help but feel it is better suited for Albums. There are 3 main section with images in the following categories, Live Albums, 80&#8242;s Classics and Our Picks. I&#8217;m not going to bother talking about each section. Basically I like the idea, however I want to click on sections, what happens if I want to look in other categories? Do they exist? Improvements could made for sure, however it needs to be talked about as there are pro&#8217;s and con&#8217;s.. I&#8217;m not getting paid for this (<em><strong>although maybe Guvera should swing me a few hundred bucks for my time</strong></em>).</p>
<h3>Channels</h3>
<p>Well I can say it doesn&#8217;t follow the same formula as the previous to pages.. but it kinda of does (not from a lack of trying). It basically lists My Channels, Our Picks and Classic Albums. Straight up, why is Classic Albums here. This has to be some sort of bug. I don&#8217;t see any relation to this. Remove it.</p>
<p>So basically a Channel is where stuff happens. I should probably expand on this, but I&#8217;m really only reviewing how things have changed and to me. It doesn&#8217;t looks like it has changed that much. I will say one thing quickly. &#8220;In the Guvera Channel, you can watch a video on &#8216;How to download&#8217;, where is the audio at? A little voice over to tell the users what is happening wouldn&#8217;t be bad, or some music. I can only assume there is nothing, or for some reason it wasn&#8217;t working on my PC (or should I say Mac now).</p>
<p>Update: There also appears to be no correlation to &#8216;My Channels&#8217; vs what I&#8217;ve actually picked to &#8216;My Channel&#8217; as seen under &#8216;My Guvera&#8217;. Of course it is called favourites, so maybe they are different things?</p>
<h3>Genres</h3>
<p>Well this follows the some formula. I can&#8217;t help but feel this formula needs improvement! I expect to see a list of genres of music I can select from, but I can only see 3 from which Guvera has picked. The thing down the bottom where I can search for a genre / refine the list. Like I said before this needs to be bigger, no scrolling, etc. This section however I&#8217;m pretty sure (100%) they aren&#8217;t even Genre&#8217;s you search for.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> There is a sub menu underneath the Genre menu when you click it. This lists other genres, however this needs work as well. Things just aren&#8217;t categorised well enough. (this was hard to find, mainly because of the said formula on the other 3 pages didn&#8217;t have this sub menu &#8211; also this technically looks to be the 4th menu from the top).</p>
<h3>New Releases &#8211; Top Downloads</h3>
<p>These two pages I&#8217;ve decided to put under the same heading. Basically it is the same formula, I&#8217;m that bored already I can&#8217;t explain it further. I will however say this is where I would expect a Grid slash (yes I typed it rather than using a symbol) Chart to display information, songs, trends, etc. Go look at the Aria charts for inspiration on this one.</p>
<h3>Other Random Pages/ Things</h3>
<ul>
<li>Favourites under &#8216;My Guvera&#8217; displayed &#8216;created&#8217;, this is now when the channel was created from what I can tell but when you actually added to be a favourite. This is miss leading.</li>
<li>My Account Details -&gt; This has still be an issue/bug since I reported it last time (either reported it or wrote about it in a blog post, if not both). I still can&#8217;t edit my date of birth to my correct one. It is still of by a day (can you at least just change this for me now, make it a 13).</li>
<li>It still doesn&#8217;t excite me, engage me or give me a reason to return. The amount of downloads is still limited to the amount of channels and how much an advertiser wants to allow. Fair enough, but I imagine you might max out at 10 downloads a year?</li>
<li>There are now credits it seems now, it is purely &#8216;downloads available&#8217; this is an improvement, I believe I commented on this ages ago.</li>
<li>No way to interact with other users on the site? How big a community is this?</li>
<li>What are the goals of Guvera, to give you legal downloads to music &#8211; well you can only do so much.. I think you need to expand your goals and become much more to keep interest (how about &#8216;Become the number 1 site for fans to get information on music&#8217;?, well.. I must admit I haven&#8217;t tried hard but I do imagine seeing stuff like artist page which albums, lyrics, tour dates, forums, chat rooms?, etc&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<h3>Summary</h3>
<p>Guvera has progressed, however I would say it has only moved forward by about one or two &#8216;Sprints&#8217; (translated Agile development talk into a time &#8211;&gt; 2 to 8 weeks). This is really slow for an up start and to be honest it is one of the reasons why I haven&#8217;t visited it until now. In fact the only reason I did as I was prompted to give some feedback again. I can&#8217;t help but feel sorry for the guys at Guvera, as I can get right behind what they are trying to do and it isn&#8217;t with out great effort on their part (or is it). It just doesn&#8217;t seem to be working out for them. I feel they need more than &#8216;Beta&#8217; testers to point our obvious flaws and bugs with the code, layout suggestions but they need to giving more direction as a company where they want to go. How they can open up and get people interested like me.</p>
<p>I wish them well, but I wont be visiting the site again until I hear people around me talking about it as I honestly feel if they don&#8217;t step their game up, their idea wont be so new and interesting in a few years once they change the lay out a bit more and fix a few bugs.</p>
<p>One point of note though. I haven&#8217;t commented on the range of music available which would have to be the biggest things. It would clearly appear they have gotten a lot more artists on board and there is more music on offer. I feel that this might of been their biggest challenge and has consumed most of their time. On this side, I think they are getting there for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jason-v.com/2011/03/08/what-is-guvera-like-since-it-first-started/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Team NVPH &#8211; Stack Overflow Web 2.0 Report</title>
		<link>http://www.jason-v.com/2010/08/31/team-nvph-stack-overflow-web-2-0-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jason-v.com/2010/08/31/team-nvph-stack-overflow-web-2-0-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web presence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jason-v.com/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a much earlier post, I posted an article pointing to Team NVPH&#8217;s web 2.0 review. To follow up with the video cast, we also put together a report based on the web 2.0 strategies Stack Overflow uses. Once again, I would like to thank everyone in the team for putting in hard work, Rod [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a much earlier post, I posted an article pointing to <a href="http://www.jason-v.com/2010/06/03/team-nvph-stack-overflow-web-2-0-review/">Team NVPH&#8217;s web 2.0 review</a>. To follow up with the video cast, we also put together a report based on the web 2.0 strategies <a href="http://www.stackoverflow.com" target="_blank">Stack Overflow</a> uses. Once again, I would like to thank everyone in the team for putting in hard work, Rod did a stand out effort.</p>
<p>Yes, I know the report is delay (a fair few months) and it may be slightly out of date, but in the past 30 days there has been an increased interest in our review so I&#8217;ve decided to upload the report.</p>
<p>To view the report click the following link: <a href="http://www.jason-v.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Team-NVPH-Stack-Overflow-Report.pdf">Team NVPH &#8211; Stack Overflow Report</a></p>
<p>If there are any questions, comments or concerns feel free to let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jason-v.com/2010/08/31/team-nvph-stack-overflow-web-2-0-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Team NVPH &#8211; Stack Overflow Web 2.0 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.jason-v.com/2010/06/03/team-nvph-stack-overflow-web-2-0-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jason-v.com/2010/06/03/team-nvph-stack-overflow-web-2-0-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QUT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jason-v.com/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a group effort (Team NVPH), I would like to share our netcast which reviews Stack Overflow and its Web 2.0 strategies. I personally would like to give a big hand out to Jonathan who spent a fair bit of time on editing the video! Direct YouTube Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peYSjTxnzK0 Direct Vimeo Link: http://www.vimeo.com/12230792]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a group effort (Team NVPH), I would like to share our netcast which reviews <a href="http://www.stackoverflow.com" target="_blank">Stack Overflow</a> and its Web 2.0 strategies. I personally would like to give a big hand out to Jonathan who spent a fair bit of time on editing the video!</p>
<p><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/peYSjTxnzK0&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/peYSjTxnzK0&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>Direct YouTube Link: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peYSjTxnzK0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peYSjTxnzK0</a><br />
Direct Vimeo Link: <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/12230792" target="_blank">http://www.vimeo.com/12230792</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jason-v.com/2010/06/03/team-nvph-stack-overflow-web-2-0-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software above the level of a single device</title>
		<link>http://www.jason-v.com/2010/04/18/software-above-the-level-of-a-single-device/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jason-v.com/2010/04/18/software-above-the-level-of-a-single-device/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jason-v.com/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been nearly three years since Tim O&#8217;Reilly talked about &#8216;Software Above the Level of a Single Device&#8217; on his blog (click here to read it), yet it is still relevant to today. Why? Well the concept is a good one in it&#8217;s broadest view every web application embraces this. For a user to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been nearly three years since Tim O&#8217;Reilly talked about &#8216;Software Above the Level of a Single Device&#8217; on his blog (<a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/11/software-above-the-level-of-a.html" target="_blank">click here to read it</a>), yet it is still relevant to today. Why? Well the concept is a good one in it&#8217;s broadest view every web application embraces this.</p>
<p>For a user to receive data from through the internet there is a least software running on the servers and and software running on the clients end to get this to work, however I don&#8217;t this this is the point Tim is trying to make. I like to think of the concept as software allowing you to do more with the device, than if the software was isolated.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.jason-v.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Foxtel-IQ.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-403  aligncenter" title="Foxtel IQ" src="http://www.jason-v.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Foxtel-IQ.png" alt="" width="146" height="98" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Take for example the Foxtel&#8217;s IQ cable box. It allows you to view channels, record shows, bring up an EPG all on the device. This functionality is extended through an iPhone App or their website which allows you to program your IQ box through the internet. It has extended your experience from using the software on the device itself, to using web software/ application to view the EPG, schedule in shows to record without using the IQ box directly.</p>
<p>This has extended to other areas inside your home, take a look at the gaming industry. Sony has create an online community, integrated with its products called the Playstation Network (PSN), Microsoft has done the same with X-Box Live and Nintendo with their online community (although very limiting).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.jason-v.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Google-Products.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-406  aligncenter" title="Google Products" src="http://www.jason-v.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Google-Products.png" alt="" width="308" height="303" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I&#8217;ve been trying to stay from examples such as Google Maps, E-Mail, Search, Images, Docs, etc simply because it there is so much to talk about and how their software through API&#8217;s, Common Protocols, Applications, etc allows their own software to be used on a wide range of devices, but really if you look at any of them you could drill down and see how they are examples of software above the level of a single device. In fact, Minterest.com published an article recently called &#8216;<a href="http://www.minterest.com/60-google-products-services-you-probably-dont-know/" target="_blank">Over 60 Google Products &amp; Services You Probably Don&#8217;t Know</a>&#8216; that gives you a break down on what Google offers. There is actually a fair few I didn&#8217;t know about and haven&#8217;t used.</p>
<p>Another similar example of been trying to escape is how the iPhone connects into iTunes on your computer. This then allows you to configure the device, sync selected data such as photos, music, playlists, applications, bookmarks, etc. While iTunes is allowing you to download music, update software on the phone, subscribe to podcasts, add lyrics to songs, download album artwork, etc all without using the iPhone itself. This can all then can synchronised back to the phone. Apple have then added in another software component called <a href="http://www.me.com/" target="_blank">mobile.me</a> which could deserve a post in itself (Take a look at Anthony Nicolaides&#8217;s post on &#8216;<a href="http://mars.discoalien.com/blog/2010/04/mobileme/" target="_blank">MobileMe above the level of a single iDevice</a>&#8216; to find out more).</p>
<p>Looking back on how far we have come in nearly three years. There is still a lot more companies can achieve by providing &#8216;software above the level of a single device&#8217; as there a still plenty of gaps above. With cloud computing increasing in popularity and continued progression of technology it really is becoming an easier world to live in. All we need now is for companies to not lock themselves into a &#8216;walled garden&#8217; and the ease of synchronising myself to the digital world will become second nature (Wow! I feel like a holiday, looking at how much I use technology in my daily life.. perhaps I&#8217;ll Google holiday resorts on my iPhone).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jason-v.com/2010/04/18/software-above-the-level-of-a-single-device/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Networking Backlash (examples)</title>
		<link>http://www.jason-v.com/2009/09/08/social-networking-backlash-examples/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jason-v.com/2009/09/08/social-networking-backlash-examples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web presence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jason-v.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social Networking in itself is a massive tool which business try to use to their own advantage. There is nothing like viral marketing working its magic but there is also a down side. Through the use of Twitter, YouTube and other social networking sites it isn&#8217;t surprising that the good comes with the bad. Jeremiah [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social Networking in itself is a massive tool which business try to use to their own advantage. There is nothing like viral marketing working its magic but there is also a down side. Through the use of Twitter, YouTube and other social networking sites it isn&#8217;t surprising that the good comes with the bad.</p>
<p>Jeremiah Owyang has posted a list of <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/05/02/a-chonology-of-brands-that-got-punkd-by-social-media/" target="_blank">A Chronology of Brands that Got Punk’d by Social Media</a> which you should take a look at, but here are 5 of my favorite stories.</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Permanent Link to United Airlines Gets the Viral Video Treatment It Never Wanted" href="http://www.destinationcrmblog.com/2009/07/09/united-airlines-gets-the-viral-video-treatment-it-never-wanted/">United Airlines Gets the Viral Video Treatment It Never Wanted</a></li>
<li><a title="The naked NOKA chocolate uncovered" href="http://www.slashfood.com/2006/12/19/noka-chocolate-exposed/">The naked NOKA chocolate uncovered</a></li>
<li><a title="Louis Vuitton gets Brandjacked in Anti-Genocide Campaign" href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/05/04/louis-vuitton-gets-brand-jacked-victimized-in-anti-genocide-campaign-tough-spot-to-be-in/">Louis Vuitton gets Brandjacked in Anti-Genocide Campaign</a></li>
<li><a title="Furniture Company Habitat Self-Evicts on Twitter" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2009/jun/22/twitter-advertising">Furniture Company Habitat Self-Evicts on Twitter</a></li>
<li><a title="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/07/brit_isps_censor_wikipedia/" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/07/brit_isps_censor_wikipedia/">Brit ISPs censor Wikipedia over &#8216;child porn&#8217; album cover</a></li>
</ul>
<p>So a word of warning for companies out there, to perhaps think about your approach to a customer or act as it may blow back on you. Just to finish it off, this blow back effect resulted in the term the&#8217; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect" target="_blank">Streisand effect</a>&#8216; in 2003 when Barbra Streisand sued a photographer over privacy concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jason-v.com/2009/09/08/social-networking-backlash-examples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Enterprise 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://www.jason-v.com/2009/08/19/what-is-enterprise-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jason-v.com/2009/08/19/what-is-enterprise-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jason-v.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A question that I&#8217;ve been asked recently is, &#8220;What is Enterprise 2.0?&#8221; and I couldn&#8217;t easily answer that. The quickest sentence I could use to describe it  is, Enterprise 2.0 is business who are using Web 2.0 technology. So lets have a look at what Enterprise 1.0 is and compare it with Enterprise 2.0: Enterprise [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question that I&#8217;ve been asked recently is, &#8220;What is Enterprise 2.0?&#8221; and I couldn&#8217;t easily answer that. The quickest sentence I could use to describe it  is, Enterprise 2.0 is business who are using Web 2.0 technology.</p>
<p>So lets have a look at what Enterprise 1.0 is and compare it with Enterprise 2.0:</p>
<table style="height: 267px;" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="5" width="591">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="50%" bgcolor="#cfecec">
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Enterprise 1.0</h2>
</td>
<td width="50%" bgcolor="#fff380">
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Enterprise 2.0</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cfecec">Hierarchy<br />
Friction<br />
Bureaucracy<br />
Inflexibility<br />
IT-driven technology / Lack of user control<br />
Top down<br />
Centralized<br />
Teams are in one building / one time zone<br />
Silos and boundaries<br />
Need to know<br />
Information systems are structured and dictated<br />
Taxonomies<br />
Overly complex<br />
Closed/ proprietary standards<br />
Scheduled<br />
Long time-to-market cycles</td>
<td bgcolor="#fff380">Flat OrganizationEase of Organization Flow<br />
Agility<br />
Flexibility<br />
User-driven technology<br />
Bottom up<br />
Distributed<br />
Teams are global<br />
Fuzzy boundaries, open borders<br />
Transparency<br />
Information systems are emergent<br />
Folksonomies<br />
Simple<br />
Open<br />
On Demand<br />
Short time-to-market cycles</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Taken from <a href="http://www.e2conf.com/about/what-is-enterprise2.0.php">http://www.e2conf.com/about/what-is-enterprise2.0.php</a></p>
<p>If you compare the two tables you will see the differences between the two. Business can also transition from a Enterprise 1.0 driven organisation to an Enterprise 2.0 driven organisation over time. There are strong benefits in that Enterprise 2.0 allows the knowledge of many accessible to many. Information is no longer constrained to help files, e-mails, books and traditional methods. Most importantly, Enterprise 2.0 is happening now (with or without you).</p>
<p>Professor Andrew McAfee, formally introduced the concept of Enterprise 2.0 in 2007. One of the easiest ways of describing the technology the enables Enterprise 2.0 (without showing or describing the technology itself) is by SLATES (or S.L.A.T.E.S.).</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>S</strong> &#8211; Search<br />
<strong>L</strong> &#8211; Links<br />
<strong>A</strong> &#8211; Authorship<br />
<strong>T</strong> &#8211; Tags<br />
<strong>E</strong> &#8211; Extensions<br />
<strong>S</strong> &#8211; Signals</p></blockquote>
<p>These concepts were quickly identified as an Enterprise 2.0 checklist. This concept has been developed further in recent times (FLATNESSES) but the 6 key concepts are still there. We can identify Enterprise 2.0 technologies using SLATES or more recently FLATNESSES, so lets move on to <strong>Enterprise 2.0 platforms</strong>.</p>
<p>Chances are that you are using these or have at least seen them. In fact I can guarantee it (your on my Blog &#8211; that you can search, view links, read articles I&#8217;ve written and allowed you to provide feedback, views tags I&#8217;ve used on content, seen extensions like my twitter updates and one of the ways I&#8217;ve signalled this is by using RSS feeds).</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Wikis</li>
<li>Blogs</li>
<li>Mashups</li>
<li>Online Communities</li>
<li>Social Bookmarking</li>
<li>Social Networking</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>Differences between Enterprise 1.0 and Enterprise 2.0 &#8211; check<br />
Ability to identify technology that uses Enterprise 2.0 &#8211; check<br />
Available platforms which helps oraganisations use Enterprise 2.0 technology? &#8211; check</p>
<h2>So, do we know what Enterprise 2.0 is?</h2>
<p>It seems that a few people are interested in organisations and sites that are actively using it. I&#8217;ll try gather a few sites together and share some examples in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jason-v.com/2009/08/19/what-is-enterprise-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

